Actions

Acute leukaemia types and MPAL: Difference between pages

From haematologyetc.co.uk

(Difference between pages)
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
----
'''Important Note'''
Flow cytometry is an important element that may alert clinicians to a diagnosis of MPAL and has an advantage of rapidity. However conclusions may subsequently be modified (e.g. by results of immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, or genetics). In some cases, findings will re-assign with significant treatment implications. It is important that this is acknowledged when assigning an initial diagnosis of MPAL.
----


----
Frequency of MPAL types
<span style="font-size:110%; color:navy">'''SECTION 1: Establishing the primitive nature of the blast cells in AML'''</span>
*MPAL with features of Myeloid and B-lineage
*MPAL with features of Myeloid and T-lineage
*MPAL with features of T- and B-lineage
*acute Undifferentiated leukaemia


[[Image:AML M1.png|130px]] 
Following further analysis cases may be assigned additionally as:
MPAL with t(9;22) (q34.1;q11.2); BCR-ABL1)
MPAL with t(v;11q23.3); with KMT2A re-arrangement


''Blast cells are recognised by morphology using features such as primitive nuclear or basophilic cytoplasmic appearances; similar principles are applied in flow cytometry where particular markers suggest a more primitive nature.




<div style="width: 95%">
<span id="anchor_0">‎</span>.
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 5px; color:black" </br>data-expandtext="Click to open Table" data-collapsetext="Click to close table"
<div style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; font-size:100%">
! colspan="2" style = "font-size:100%; color:black"| '''Table:''' Markers primarily used to confirm primitive nature in AML. &nbsp;
{| class="wikitable" style="color:black; background-color:#ffffff;" cellpadding="0"
|-  
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:90%; font-color:navy; style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Requirements to assign myeloid lineage in MPAL'''</br></span>
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1"|The expression of some markers is typically associated with primitive cells and can help recognise the primitive nature of blast cells.</br>Note that these markers may also have some lineage specificity but are not generally used to assign lineage
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="Click for explanation" data-collapsetext="Hide explanation">
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<span style="font-size:80%; text-align:left;"></br>The assignment of myeloid lineage recognises MPO expression to be a defining marker of myeloid lineage. However MPO is expressed only by around 80% of AML cases. The assignment of myeloid lineage can therefore also be made if monocytic lineage can be established, requiring at least 2 of 5 possible lineage markers to be detected (although only 3 of these can be established by flow cytometry).</br>
</span>
</div></div></div>
|-
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD45]]'''
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |'''Marker option 1'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|A marker expressed by all leukocytes and their precursors. In AML expression is characteristically "weak" i.e. significantly less intense than normal lymphocytes or monocytes. In monocytic AML expression may be stronger, particular in mare mature monocytic forms where expression may resemble normal monocytes.
|-
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD34]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''Demonstrate expression of Myeloperoxidase (MPO)'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|Frequently expressed by AML blast cells (40-80% of cases) - most often in less differentiated forms of AML. Expression is also seen frequently (and often more strongly) in ALL'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|[[MPO|Myeloperoxidase]] expression alone may be sufficient to establish myeloid lineage, but be aware of the limitations: '''(1)''' intensity should be at least half of that of mature neutrophils in at least of proportion of cells measured by the same method; '''(2)''' there are circumstances where judgement is required (see notes).
|-
|-
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:light gray" |'''Other markers:''' In the context of a proven AML diagnosis a number of markers may be expressed that reflect the primitive nature of the cells. Some of these are more frequently associated with lymphoid disorders, but providing other criteria for AML are met they should simply be considered to show "primitivness".</br>These include: [[CD38]], [[HLA-DR]], [[TDT]], [[CD7]].
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |'''Marker option 2'''
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''Demonstrate clear evidence of monocytic lineage'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;|If MPO is not demonstrated then myeloid lineage may still be assigned through demonstration of monocytic features. This can be assigned by the detection of '''at least two''' of the following features: By flow cytometry: [[CD11c]], [[CD14]], [[CD64]]; by other approaches: '''lysozyme''' or '''non-specific esterase''' in malignant cells (enzyme cytochemistry)
|-
|-
|}
|}
</div>
</div>
----


<span id="anchor_0">‎</span>.
<div style="width: 100%; border: 0px solid black; font-size:100%">
{| class="wikitable" style="color:navy; background-color:white";
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:90%; font-color:black; style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid black; background-color:white">|'''NOTE''' Interpretation of MPO positivity in MPAL</span>
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="Click for details" data-collapsetext="Hide details">
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
<span style="font-size:90%; text-align:left;"></br>The WHO classification advises that MPO expression is assessed by its intensity of expression. The is based on two considerations:


<span style="font-size:110%; color:navy">'''SECTION 2: Assigning blast cells as myeloid lineage i.e. Diagnosing AML'''</span>
<span style="font-size:90%; font-color:navy;>'''1. The techniques used to detect MPO do not have the same sensitivity:''' immunohistochemistry > flow cytometry > enzyme-cytochemistry. This means diagnosis of MPAL may be method dependent – expressing MPO as intensity allows expression to be compared with that of normal cells detected using the same method.</br>   
 
'''2. MPO is not entirely specific for myeloid lineage:''' this is particularly the case when expression is dim, so an element of subjectivity is allowed when interpreting (particularly when detected by more sensitive techniques such as immunocytochemistry).</br></br>
[[Image:AML M2.png|150px]]  
Some suggestions have been made that may aid interpretation (weak evidence base):
 
*<span style="font-size:90%;>Applying a threshold of >10% cells being positive for MPO may improve specificity.
''In morphology other features are used to indicate myeloid lineage, some are highly specificsuch as Auer rods, others may suggest myeloid lineage but be less specific. Again similar principles apply in flow cytometry''
*<span style="font-size:90%;>*Variability of expression level by blast cells may suggest partial maturation and support myeloid lineage origin.
 
*<span style="font-size:90%;>*The expression of other myeloid markers may allow greater confidence that MPO is lineage specific.
 
</br>
There are two ways to make a diagnosis of AML
<span style="font-size:90%;>Be aware of common patterns of aberrancy that are associated with specific alternative diagnoses:
<div style="width: 95%"; >
*<span style="font-size:90%;>*Dim (weak) expression of MPO may be a feature of otherwise typical B-LL/LBL
{| class="wikitable"
*<span style="font-size:90%;>Burkitt-like entities may have strong MPO staining however other investigations will confirm their nature and other myeloid markers will be absent.
!colspan="2" style = "background:lightgrey; border:solid"| '''Requirements to diagnose AML by flow cytometry'''
</br>
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid; font-size:90%;"| '''Pattern 1:'''</br>A myeloid lineage-defining marker pattern is present</br>'''and'''</br>No lineage-defining markers of T or B cells are present
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; font-size:90%;"|See '''Table '''1 for lineage-defining marker patterns in AML
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid; font-size:90%;"| '''Pattern 2:'''</br>At least two myeloid lineage-associated markers are present</br>'''and'''</br>There are no lineage defining markers of T or B cells</br>'''AND'''</br>No more than one: T-cell ''or''' B-cell lineage-associated markers are  present
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; font-size:90%;"|See '''Table 2A''' and '''Table 2B''' for lineage-associated markers in AML
|}
|}
</div>
</div>
</span>
</div></div></div>


----


 
<span id="anchor_0">‎</span>.
<div style="width: 95%">
<div style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; font-size:100%">
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 5px; color:black" data-expandtext="Click to open Table" data-collapsetext="Click to close table"
{| class="wikitable" style="color:black; background-color:#ffffff;" cellpadding="0"
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:100%; colour:white; text-align:left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Table 1:''' Myeloid-lineage defining markers in AML </span><span style="font-size:100%; text-align:left; background:white">
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:90%; font-color:navy; style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Requirements to assign B-lymphoid lineage in MPAL'''</br></span>
|-
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="Click for explanation" data-collapsetext="Hide explanation">
|colspan="2" <span style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1">|Lineage is defined by either the definite assignment to myeloid lineage or definite assignment to monocytic lineage. In each case there are specific criteria.
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
|-
<span style="font-size:80%; text-align:left;"></br>For B-lymphoid lineage assignment the key lineage-marker is CD19. However, this marker has recognised aberrant expression in AML cases so additional criteria of expression intensity it is required that other markers must be expressed in addition to allow B-lineage assignment.</br>
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |1. Definite myeloid linage marker: expression of '''[[MPO]]'''
</span>
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|A '''lineage-defining''' marker in AML when expressed (around 80% of cases). More frequent expressed in cases with granulocytic maturation. When detected by flow cytometry is diagnostic of myeloid differentiation is established.
</div></div></div>
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |2. Definite monocytic lineage, assigned if '''at least two''' of the following are expressed '''[[CD14]], [[CD11c]], [[CD64]], [[NSE]], lysozyme*'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|A '''two of these are lineage-defining''' in AML. Indicating monocytic maturation. *Note that NSE is a cytochemical stain.
|}
</div>
<div style="width: 95%">
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 5px; color:black" data-expandtext="Click to open Table" data-collapsetext="Click to close table"
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:100%; colour:white; text-align:left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Table 2A:''' Myeloid lineage-associated markers (Main Set)'''</span><span style="font-size:90%; text-align:left; background:white">
|-
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |Each of these markers is frequently expressed in AML (80% of cases). They support a diagnosis of myeloid lineage, but are not sufficiently specific to be AML-defining when expressed alone.</br>These markers may be considered the most frequent markers expressed by AML, but are not alone sufficient to diagnose myeloid lineage.</br>However, in the absence of markers suggesting alternative lineage expression of '''two''' of these markers may be used to assign myeloid lineage.
</br>
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD117]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|An early marker of myeloid lineage, seen in up to 80% of AML and vauable in recognising more primitive differentaiion forms (note that aberrant expression is seen in up to 20% of ALL cases)
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD33]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|A good marker for AML, particularly for those cases with granulocytic maturation, CD33 is often less strongly expressed in AML with monocytic dfferentiation and strongly expressed in APL.
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD13]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|A good lineage marker for AML that is acquired a little later in differentation than CD117 or CD33; expression of CD13 is often higher than CD33 in AML with monocytic differentiation.
|-
|-
|}
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |'''Marker option 1'''
</div>
<div style="width: 95%">
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed wikitable" style="border-style: solid; border-width: 5px; color:black" data-expandtext="Click to open Table" data-collapsetext="Click to close table"
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:100%; colour:white; text-align:left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Table 2B:''' Myeloid lineage-associated markers (Specific differentiation)'''</span><span style="font-size:90%; text-align:left; background:white">
|-
|-
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |The markers already described above are sufficient to make a diagnosis of typical AML in most cases. Typically the markers in this table are associated with specific features of differentiation so will not be present in all cases, but may be helpful as "lineage-assocated" markers in difficult cases. Care should be taken when doing so, since in some cases specificity may be lower than for typical myeloid markers.
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;"|'''Required''' [[CD19|Strong expression of CD19]]
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|To meet the definition of "strong" the expression intensity '''must exceed''' that of 50% of normal B lymphocytes
|-
|-
!colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|Granulocytic lineage markers
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|'''In addition''' 1 of: [[CD10]], [[CD22]], or [[CD79a]] (surface or cytoplasmic)
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|If CD19 is strong then B-lineage can be assigned if there is '''at least ONE''' of these additional markers
|-
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD11b]]'''
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |'''Marker option 2'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|A marker of both granulocytic and monocytic maturation, this marker has previously been associated with less good outcome in a number of studies
|-
|-
!colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|Monocytic lineage markers
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;"|'''Required''' [[CD19|Weak expression of CD19]]
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|To meet the definition of "weak" the expression intensity must be '''less than''' that of 50% of normal B lymphocytes
|-
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD11c]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|'''In addition''' 2 of: [[CD10]], [[CD22]], or [[CD79a]] (surface or cytoplasmic)
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|This marker is most associated with monocytic maturation in AML being fairly well corellated with CD11B, but overall probably less specific for monocytic differentiation that CD14
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|If CD19 is weak then B-lineage can be assigned only if there are '''at least TWO''' of these additional markers
|-
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD14]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|Primarily a marker of monocytic maturation in AML, seen most often in more differentiated forms, when present CD14 be considered a strong indicator of monocytic phenotype.
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD64]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|A good lineage marker for monocytic differentiation in AML, expressed in both monoblastic and monocytic forms, not fully sepicific when expressed at lower levels.
|-
!colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|'''Features associated with erythroid differentiation'''
|-
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|Most often [[CD34]], [[CD45]] and [[HLA-DR]] are weak or negative, although [[CD117]] and [[CD36]] are generally expressed. There may be some expression of platelet markers in some cases.
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD71]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|Frequently expressed though not fully lineage specific
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD235]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|A good marker of erythroid differentiation but acquired late and therefore may not be expressed
|-
!colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|'''Features associated with megakaryocytic differentiation'''
|-
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%;background:white;"|Most often [[CD34]], [[CD45]] and [[HLA-DR]] are weak or negative, although [[CD13]] and [[CD33]] may be expressed
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD41]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|Platelet glycoprotein IIbIIIa
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD61]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|Platelet glycoprotein IIIa
|-
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;" |'''[[CD36]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:84%;"|Relatively non-specific (seen in erythroid and monocytic leukaemias) but often strongly expressed
</span>
|}
|}
</div>
</div>




 
<span id="anchor_0"></span>.
----
<div style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; font-size:100%">
 
{| class="wikitable" style="color:black; background-color:#ffffff;" cellpadding="0"
<span style="font-size:110%; color:navy">'''SECTION 3: When to consider alternative lineage assignment'''</span>
!colspan="2" <span style="font-size:90%; font-color:navy; style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid black; background:pale gray">|'''Requirements to assign T-lymphoid lineage in MPAL'''</br></span>
 
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="Click for explanation" data-collapsetext="Hide explanation">
The "aberrent" expression of lymphoid markers is frequently encountered in AML (and in some patterns of mutation these may be expected); however when non-myeloid markers are found it is important to consder if this changes lineage assignment. There are several conditions that should be considered:
<div class="mw-collapsible-content">
 
<span style="font-size:80%; text-align:left;"></br>For T-lymphoid lineage assignment the key lineage-marker is CD3. Provided that this marker meets the intensity criteria then it is T-lineage defining in MPAL. This expression can be determined either by CD3 detection by flow cytometry OR by immunocytochemistry on trephine.</br>
 
</span>
<div style="width: 95%"; font-size:90%>
</div></div></div>
{| class="wikitable"  
!colspan="2" style = "background:lightgrey; border:solid"| '''When to consder an amended lineage assignment'''</br>The criteria below are brief and only indicate where concern should be raised, please see link (in blue) for full information.
|-
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid"| Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukaemia</br>Go to link</br>See: '''[[MPAL]]'''
|colspan="2" style = "font-size:90%; color:black; background:#ddeee1" |'''Marker requirement'''
!colspan="1" style = "background:white;border:solid; font-size:90%;"| There is sufficient evidence to assign myeloid lineage '''but''' the cells also express either a lineage-defining marker of T or B cells, or more than one lineage associated marker of T or B cells.
|-
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid"| Acute Undifferentiated Leukaenmia</br>See: '''[[AUL]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%; color:black;"|'''Either''' [[CD3|CD3 surface or cytoplasm (strong)]]
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; font-size:90%;"| There is insufficient evidence to assign myeloid lineage, but there is expression of one myeloid-associated marker, '''and''' you cannot assign T-cell or B-cell lineage. I
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|To meet the definition of "strong" the expression intensity '''must exceed''' that of 50% of normal T lymphocytes
|-
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid"| Early T-cell precursor ALL</br>See: '''[[Non-haem]]'''
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|'''Or''' [[CD3|CD3 by immunocytochemistry (strong)]]
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; font-size:90%;"| Myeloid markers may occasionaly be expressed by non-haematological cells. Consider in atypical cases particularly where CD45 expression is very weak.
|colspan="1" style = "font-size:90%;"|For immunohistochemistry it is important a '''non-zeta chain reagent''' is used
|-
|-
!colspan="1" style = "background:#FFFFF0;border:solid"| Non-haematological malignancy</br>See '''[[ETP-ALL]]'''
!colspan="1" style = "background:white; border:solid; font-size:90%;"| The marker pattern is of a primitive T cell neoplasm with lineage-defining crieria, but there are also myeloid markers expressed
|}
|}
 
</div>
----

Revision as of 11:51, 16 November 2023


Important Note Flow cytometry is an important element that may alert clinicians to a diagnosis of MPAL and has an advantage of rapidity. However conclusions may subsequently be modified (e.g. by results of immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, or genetics). In some cases, findings will re-assign with significant treatment implications. It is important that this is acknowledged when assigning an initial diagnosis of MPAL.


Frequency of MPAL types

  • MPAL with features of Myeloid and B-lineage
  • MPAL with features of Myeloid and T-lineage
  • MPAL with features of T- and B-lineage
  • acute Undifferentiated leukaemia

Following further analysis cases may be assigned additionally as: MPAL with t(9;22) (q34.1;q11.2); BCR-ABL1) MPAL with t(v;11q23.3); with KMT2A re-arrangement


.

Requirements to assign myeloid lineage in MPAL


The assignment of myeloid lineage recognises MPO expression to be a defining marker of myeloid lineage. However MPO is expressed only by around 80% of AML cases. The assignment of myeloid lineage can therefore also be made if monocytic lineage can be established, requiring at least 2 of 5 possible lineage markers to be detected (although only 3 of these can be established by flow cytometry).

Marker option 1
Demonstrate expression of Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Myeloperoxidase expression alone may be sufficient to establish myeloid lineage, but be aware of the limitations: (1) intensity should be at least half of that of mature neutrophils in at least of proportion of cells measured by the same method; (2) there are circumstances where judgement is required (see notes).
Marker option 2
Demonstrate clear evidence of monocytic lineage If MPO is not demonstrated then myeloid lineage may still be assigned through demonstration of monocytic features. This can be assigned by the detection of at least two of the following features: By flow cytometry: CD11c, CD14, CD64; by other approaches: lysozyme or non-specific esterase in malignant cells (enzyme cytochemistry)

.

NOTE Interpretation of MPO positivity in MPAL


The WHO classification advises that MPO expression is assessed by its intensity of expression. The is based on two considerations:

1. The techniques used to detect MPO do not have the same sensitivity: immunohistochemistry > flow cytometry > enzyme-cytochemistry. This means diagnosis of MPAL may be method dependent – expressing MPO as intensity allows expression to be compared with that of normal cells detected using the same method.
2. MPO is not entirely specific for myeloid lineage: this is particularly the case when expression is dim, so an element of subjectivity is allowed when interpreting (particularly when detected by more sensitive techniques such as immunocytochemistry).

Some suggestions have been made that may aid interpretation (weak evidence base):

  • Applying a threshold of >10% cells being positive for MPO may improve specificity.
  • *Variability of expression level by blast cells may suggest partial maturation and support myeloid lineage origin.
  • *The expression of other myeloid markers may allow greater confidence that MPO is lineage specific.


Be aware of common patterns of aberrancy that are associated with specific alternative diagnoses:

  • *Dim (weak) expression of MPO may be a feature of otherwise typical B-LL/LBL
  • Burkitt-like entities may have strong MPO staining however other investigations will confirm their nature and other myeloid markers will be absent.



.

Requirements to assign B-lymphoid lineage in MPAL


For B-lymphoid lineage assignment the key lineage-marker is CD19. However, this marker has recognised aberrant expression in AML cases so additional criteria of expression intensity it is required that other markers must be expressed in addition to allow B-lineage assignment.

Marker option 1
Required Strong expression of CD19 To meet the definition of "strong" the expression intensity must exceed that of 50% of normal B lymphocytes
In addition 1 of: CD10, CD22, or CD79a (surface or cytoplasmic) If CD19 is strong then B-lineage can be assigned if there is at least ONE of these additional markers
Marker option 2
Required Weak expression of CD19 To meet the definition of "weak" the expression intensity must be less than that of 50% of normal B lymphocytes
In addition 2 of: CD10, CD22, or CD79a (surface or cytoplasmic) If CD19 is weak then B-lineage can be assigned only if there are at least TWO of these additional markers


.

Requirements to assign T-lymphoid lineage in MPAL


For T-lymphoid lineage assignment the key lineage-marker is CD3. Provided that this marker meets the intensity criteria then it is T-lineage defining in MPAL. This expression can be determined either by CD3 detection by flow cytometry OR by immunocytochemistry on trephine.

Marker requirement
Either CD3 surface or cytoplasm (strong) To meet the definition of "strong" the expression intensity must exceed that of 50% of normal T lymphocytes
Or CD3 by immunocytochemistry (strong) For immunohistochemistry it is important a non-zeta chain reagent is used